COOKED HIS BOOKS-for court on 5/14/12

THE LANDLORD COOKED HIS BOOKS, FOR COURT ON MAY 14, 2012.  THE LANDLORD IS GILBERT POLINSKY.

 THE DOCUMENT ABOVE HAS ALREADY BEEN SUBMITTED IN COURT AS PART OF THE LANDLORD'S MOTION, IN FEBRUARY 2012, SO JUDGE LYDIA C. LAI HAS IN HER HANDS EVIDENCE THAT THE LANDLORD'S INTERNAL LEDGERS DO NOT MATCH THE INVOICE(S) THAT HE MAILED TO HIS TENANT.  THIS IS ALREADY IN COURT, AS PUBLIC INFORMATION.

[ what follows below is an email I sent to Attorney Ben Meskin in preparation for court on May 14, 2012 that explains, notwithstanding do you know anyone else who has to go to these ridiculous extremes because our court system is so corrupt ?? !  ]

Attorney Ben Meskin:

( A )  I am posting the attached documents on a blog-site, so every one can see them.

( B )  Pls. find attached, the Landlord's exhibit [ LL exhibit ] from his summary judgment motion, from Feb. 14, 2012, that shows the llandlord's internal rent ledger sheets do not match the invoices that he mailed to the tenant, to wit:  his 11/01/11 rent demand for $2698.04 does not match his internal ledger sheet on 11/01/2011 for 2473.04 [ these are both on the same page, for ease of reference ].

By the landlord's own arguments in his summary judgment motion and this, his own example,  alone, the landlord's motion should be denied.

As per a supervisor at the rent board, an expert witness, the landlord's internal ledger sheets are never taken as fact over the invoices that he mailed to the tenant, because the landlord's internal bookkeeping software programs mean nothing; he can cook his books any way he wants, whenever he wants.  

The court-appointed guardian/attorney, Michael A. Valentine, never bothered checking the invoices.  He never bothered checking any evidence. 

The attorney that Betty fired, Patrick Marc, has had these invoices and more, since, on or before, late December 2011/early January 2012.   In addition, on April 4, 2012, he stated falsely on-the-record in open court that the landlord wrote the accurate amount that Betty should pay on the invoices.   This example(s), and other invoices, that Attorney Patrick Marc had since, at least, January 2012, show that when he lied on April 11, 2012, he knew he was lying; his goal was to make a false court record.  I also have a video-tape of a meeting that shows the same.

( C )  Pls. find attached 6 more examples of invoices that the landlord mailed to the tenant that do not match the landlord's ledger sheets 

[ Jan'09, Feb '09,

March '09, June '09, Nov '09, February 2010 ], and, the ledger sheets to compare them to. 

lawyer 3,4,5 = the ledger sheets, see lawyer 5.

lawyer 6 = Feb 2010 invoice

lawyer 7 = Nov '09 invoice

lawyer 8 = March '09 and June '09 invoices

lawyer 9 = Feb '09 invoice

lawyer 10 = Jan '09 invoice.

 I have more.

( D )  The bottom line is this, the landlord's internal ledger sheets are bogus. 

Because the landlord included an example of how his internal ledger sheets are bogus in his own motion, there is enough evidence on-the-record for the judge to make a ruling in Betty's favor, right now.

Frankly, I don't believe anything this landlord says.

( E )  The burden of proof is on the landlord  to show that Betty owes him money.

The only thing the landlord has demonstrated, so far, is that his internal ledger sheets are BOGUS. 

Betty should be asking to have this action against her DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

( F )  I have an audio-taped conversation with a person trained to answer questions about the senior citizen discount program, SCRIE, that shows the landlord was also at fault for not getting Betty's benefits renewed in a more timely manner.   Her applications were delayed, in part, because the office that adminsters this program was waiting for the landlord's response(s).

( G  )  In spite of all the landlord's lies and dirty tricks, and construing everything in a light most favorable to the landlord, the most he can ask for from Betty, 

TODAY, is about $3,400.  

And, this amount should be reduced by about another one to two hundred dollars, as a rough estimate, because he did not credit her with all the late fees.

Lawyer 1 = a summary of payments and credits.

Lawyer  2 =  a summary of charges.

Betty has a little over $XXXX in her checking account, today.  She has spent over $XXXX defending herself againt this landlord's harassment.  Where did the money go?

Defending herself against a dishonest landlord.

I have spent about the same.

The only thing I got for helping Ms. Piovanetti defend herself against this landlord is threats, expense, and harassment, enough to make my nerve damage worse.

( H )  Marc Piovanetti took his mother's check books and will not give them to her.

She already told the judge that he stole her jewelry, in the recent past; she and family and friends state that he stole from her checking account.  They state that he does not want the banking information to come to light, because those records may should that he stole from his mother's checking account.  Marc Piovanetti has already threatend me.  I asked for orders of protection against him for me, see the You Tube video I made on my "crookeddoctors" channel, go to You Tube website, and in their search bar type in "crookeddoctors" , as one word, with no spaces, you will come to my vidoes, and you can see/listen to the video of Marc Piovanetti threatening to make false criminal charges against me.  

We needed to check some information in her check receipts.

We asked Attorney Patrick Marc to make a subpoena to check a few items when Marc Piovanetti obstructed his mother's defense, to serve his own interests.  Attorney Patrick Marc refused. 

We asked Attorney Patrick Marc to make a subpoena to show that the rent overcharges were willful; he refused.  These are some of the reasons that Betty fired him, in addition to the fact that he filed reply/anwser papers without showing them to Betty, and in other ways hindered Betty's defense. 

( I )  This email is copied to Brother Tapia, at Betty's church, and her brother, Louis.

( J )  The advice that I get, to protect myself and Betty, is to publish this information widely, particularly for Betty.   Landlords are notorious for stopping at nothing to get a rent-stabilized apartment deregulated, especially in cases with elderly tenants who appear to be alone and defenseless.